Following his previous court appearance over security arrangements, Prince Harry's newest claims against his own family have sparked a new controversy.
The Duke of Sussex said that security officers told him there was a purposeful attempt to retain him and his wife Meghan as working members of the royal family.
Harry's comments come after he attended a two-day legal procedure in the UK, when he questioned the Home Office's security, alleging he was "singled out" for "unjustified and inferior treatment".
According to reports, King Charles III's youngest son sees the withdrawal of his protection as a way to compel him and his family to return to Britain.
In response to Harry's recently discovered claims regarding his security and royal leave, royal pundit Duncan Larcombe slammed the Duke, calling his charges "bizarre."
"It seems to be this constant dialect from Harry if things aren't going his way, he plays the victim," Larcombe told the BBC.
The expert continued to share his and the public's likely sentiments on the prince, adding: "When this happens, he becomes less and less popular with the British public, who used to adore him."
Larcombe went on to say that the Duke's security worries appeared to be inconsistent, noting: "Harry is afraid of his own security, so he goes to a war zone." That is somewhat ironic, isn't it?
Harry feels his father, King Charles, may intercede in the security situation since the monarch's private secretary, Sir Clive Alderton, serves on the Royal and VIP Executive Committee.
However, palace insiders have firmly rejected the monarch's involvement in the legal process, stating: "These are matters of security and government policy, and, as usual, it would be inappropriate to comment or intervene on either."
#princeharry #royalfamily